Monday, October 22, 2012

Mitt Romney goes into the "Prevent Defense"

It is unbelievable that Mitt Romney did not answer a direct question teed up for him by the moderator  Bob Schieffer  - regarding the question of whether Obama mislead the American people over the unmitigated debacle and possible treason that was Benghazi.  He gave Romney an open end question, inviting him to address the Libya debacle.

Romney chose to ignore the question and instead recite a monologue that sounded like a canned political speech.

Romney then allowed Obama to interrupt him and take over the question that was actually posed to himself - not Obama.

It became evident six minutes into the debate that Mitt Romney either did no debate prep or he is deliberately going into the notorious "prevent defense" - weeks before the election.

It was absolutely inconceivable that the Romney campaign could find a way to actually allow this saboteur to put ROMNEY on the defensive minutes into the debate - yet he DID.  Dear God it is unbelievable.  I am stunned.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

A debate clearly orchestrated for Barack Obama

Asking a question of Romney about women’s equality in the workplace?  Mitt Romney answered the question effectively but it was clearly a question designed for Democrats and their false contentions of a Republicans “war on women”.

Asking about positions on contraception, which was absolutely teed up for Barack Obama and their allegation of a Republican “war on women”.

Neither of these topics are pressing "issues" in the current elections but rather designed by the Democrat Party to distract attention away from the sabotage taking place in Washington D.C.

Planting a question about immigration, which Romney handled well and took a clear stance on illegal immigration but clearly a question designed to allow Obama to pander to the Hispanic vote.

Asking Romney a question about how he differs George Bush? Clearly a question that was designed to allow Obama to further campaign against Georg Bush.

The moderator consistently cut Romney off before allowing him to reply to Obama’s allegations despite it not being his turn to speak.

The moderator was often “leading the witness” (Obama) as in the case of the AK-47 question and added elements to the questions that were not asked by the town hall audience members.

Obama asked Romney a direct question ‘as a professional investor, what if I came to you with an investment…. but I cannot show you the details?

The one answer I was hoping to hear to that question directly asked of Romney – by Obama - I was praying that Romney would say that was –exactly- how they passed Obamacare. Politicians ostensibly elected to represent the American people told us, despite the vast majority of Americans opposing universal healthcare – we have to pass the bill BEFORE we can read the bill.

After the moderator would interrupt Romney, preventing him from defending himself against Obama’s distortions, she would assure him that they would “come back to that and give him the opportunity to speak later”. This town hall format was clearly not a format allowing note taking as they had no note pads. It is absurd to suppose that anyone there would be able to enumerate those false accusations “later”.

Romney did as well as he could but this all begs the question of WHY the GOP and our nominee agrees to participate in debates “moderated” by left wing Democrats that are nothing more than set-ups?

Thursday, October 11, 2012

The Most Bizarre Performance in Vice Presidential History: Ryan Wins

31 minutes into the debate and one thing is clear - Joe Biden’s behavior will appeal to the obnoxious who are already in his corner – but any decent person watching the circus environment of his creation - will recognize the absolutely sophomoric behavior for what it is.

Biden had his first strike against himself when he walked out on the stage with his face pulled so tight you could bounce a quarter off of it.  At first I asked my wife what Barbara Walters was doing on the stage. 

Biden’s non-stop, fake laughter was bizarre and painful to watch.  He is a caricature of a used car salesman.  I say caricature because it really is unfair to compare those hard working people to this buffoon.

EVERY SINGLE TIME that Paul Ryan began to make a cogent point, the shrill shill on the stage posing as a moderator interrupted “gentlemen, we have to move on”.  Biden was enabled in giving uninterrupted filibusters when he was asked a question.  Biden was uninterrupted because he was on the stage with an actual gentleman.  I cannot recall one time that Paul Ryan was allowed to make a single uninterrupted point when directly asked a question by the moderator.  It began to look obvious that there was collusion between her and the Obama administration.  We know that is the Chicago way and we know that the Obama press colludes as we have heard first hand on recorded conversations between poseurs from competing news agencies.

If this were the founding era, I highly doubt that Joe Biden would have ever made it to the station of US Senator.  Biden would have likely been mortally wounded or in prison as a result of the many duals in which he would have no doubt participated given his indefatigable pomposity.  This man would not last a day among gentlemen in an era where assaults against integrity were settled on the field of honor. 

To advise this individual against such juvenile behavior would be to cast a pearl before swine.  It is clear Joe Biden is not -nor has he ever been- a genteel man.  In the end, this was a clear victory for Paul Ryan because he maintained his composure, he was earnest and despite Biden being twice his age – Ryan was clearly the only serious adult on the stage.

Biden certainly fancies himself a thespian and he has NAILED the personality of one fictional movie character from a blockbuster film who immediately came to mind 5 minutes into the circus.  Watch and you will know who Biden was studying in preparation for this debate: Now please parson me as I feel I must take a shower after subjecting myself to the grotesque performance to which we were all subjected.

Friday, October 5, 2012

Only a Fringe Kook would Buy these OLabor Numbers

To the shock of very few, the Labor Department came out with some help for Barack Obama today.  (Not that the numbers are good but the degree of the move is dubious.)  Knowing how adroit Obama and his 3rd world administration are at using federal agencies to usurp power, they probably had these employment numbers planned as their "ace in the hole" long before the Wednesday night debate.   If Obama had performed competently in the debate, I have little doubt the numbers would have been calculated differently.

What fool wouldn't believe that this administration WOULD NOT cook the books to maintain power to finish their mission of destroying this nation?  Seriously.  Hey, what ever happened to that billion dollars of investor money Obama buddy Jon Corzine "misplaced"?  I doubt we'll ever know because the "JUSTICE" DEPARTMENT deemed the question of whether Corzine plundered the missing BILLION as irrelevant and decided not to pursue (former Goldman Sachs partner) Corzine.  No, federal O-agencies like Justice and the Labor Department are impenetrable to partisanship.

• Of course they manufactured the numbers. They lie about everything else. They sell arms to drug cartels. They apologize to terrorists who murder our ambassadors and blame it on our freedoms.

NOT to believe this administration had this data massaged would be akin to being a "kook" who is prone to conspiracy theory. Soviet style tactics are the norm for this cabal, although the kind of allegiance this would-be dictator elicits from the media in this country is enough to make even Vladimir Putin envious.

“Obama: Our greatest National Security Risk”